> this also seems (to me) to imply that 'invalid == drop' policy is > global, no? I suspect for a great long while 'invalid == lowered pref' > will predominate. Hopefully when we get more comfortable and more > reasonable with operations of the rPKI we'll have less cheese to deal > with.
this was my original position, but [other] operators whacked me out of it. essentially the argument is, if you're not gonna drop something that is clearly invalid, then why the heck run it? and the rpki having all the consistency problems of a widely distributed database is not related to, or effected by, incremental deployment. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
