+1 support. It's import to defend "AS removal" attack. _____________________________________________________ Yang Xiang, PhD student, Tsinghua Univ., about.me/xiangyang
2011/7/28 Danny McPherson <[email protected]> > > Doug et al, > I like the general objective of pCNT and this seems a good idea to me. My > only comment at the microphone was that if we add this for compression, then > validation should require that pCNT MUST be equal to the number of > _contiguous ASx appearances in the path (i.e., no more, no less, and only > contiguous). > > I do wonder if pCNT=0 for transparent route servers introduces the > opportunity for some sort of downgrade attack of sorts.. > > -danny > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
