Doug Montgomery wrote (on Thu 28-Jul-2011 at 11:54 -0500);
...
> I think we would all benefit from your offer to survey the RS
> community to see if solutions that did not effect PATH_LENGTH but do
> make the RS AS# visible somewhere in the protocol (we can quibble
> about the syntax of carrying that in AS_PATH vs PATH_SIGs later).

Will do.

Chris

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to