> Q2: Is it well rooted in the historical measurement data for its > projections into the future? > > Q3: Are additional assumptions made for projecting into the future > reasonable? In this instance, are the assumptions regarding the BGPSEC > take rate reasonable?
as humans and as engineers, we are well known for poor predictions of the future. we each have a model and they differ widely. and if you extrapolate, especially with a complex model, i become very suspicious of any and all of your data. this is why the data i give on rpki-rtr is what we have measured and only what we have measured, 10u on a gsr/xr to validate one incoming prefix, 4-7 seconds on gsr/xr, 7206/ios, and juniper m7 and m240 to load 360k roas built to map the current route views table. this is from a freebsd 8.2 server over both local gige and wan with 63ms rtt, seems to make little difference. we have not yet been able to make finer grained measurements, you are welcome to extrapolate all you wish. i do not wish to. i have no idea what the timing would be with twice that many roas. i would guess it would take more time, but i really have no idea, it could be a flat constant! randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
