On Oct 17, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Stephen Kent wrote: > At 10:50 AM -0400 10/14/11, Sandra Murphy wrote: >> The wg has just demonstrated a lack of support for adoption of a suggested >> cert profile for routers in draft-turner-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles. >> >> Unfortunately, a router certificate is already mentioned in existing wg >> drafts. > > Sandy, > > Since the WG is proceeding with the BGPSEC protocol and architecture, > there is a need for a cert profile for routers. It also makes sense to have > these certs be tied to the RPLI, since theses certs are linked to the > AS# of the net with which the router is associated. So, I believe that > WG members (including me?) were not paying attention for this call for > adoption.
I for one completely missed the CfA[0]…. and, had I not, would have supported adoption…. > > Can we have a do over :-)? > Yah, please… W [0]: Sorry, I've been reading too many of the OAM discussions and figured I wasn't cool if I didn't unnecessarily abbreviate…. > Steve > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
