At 10:50 AM -0400 10/14/11, Sandra Murphy wrote:
The wg has just demonstrated a lack of support for adoption of a
suggested cert profile for routers in
draft-turner-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles.
Unfortunately, a router certificate is already mentioned in existing
wg drafts.
Sandy,
Since the WG is proceeding with the BGPSEC protocol and architecture,
there is a need for a cert profile for routers. It also makes sense to have
these certs be tied to the RPLI, since theses certs are linked to the
AS# of the net with which the router is associated. So, I believe that
WG members (including me?) were not paying attention for this call
for adoption.
Can we have a do over :-)?
Steve
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
