As a WG participant who reads this with a "writing a MIB module
for RPKI" I have no issues with this document.
Bert
On 10/28/11 3:59 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Two folks seem to have given this a read-through, is that all the
interest that exists? is documenting how originators of routes ought
to think/use/abuse RPKI not something we should do here?
please chime in if you've given this a read and are onboard with it
moving forward.
-chris
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Randy Bush<[email protected]> wrote:
What's the rationale of this change from version 10 to 11?
after much discussion with ops and security folk, it is the purpose of
the whole exercise. you wanna stop 7007?
fwiw, it has swung back and forth a few times
randy
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
