On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Shane Amante <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> agreed, some manner of prefix + as-path seems like it'd sure solve >> this problem. :( > > Please note that, for the specific case above, I did not mention > "complicated" & "burdensome" prefix-list filtering … just AS_PATH sanity > check filtering, i.e.: if you see AS (FOO|BAR|BAZ) in the path, drop (don't > learn) the route. Also, I would note that this type of configuration > re-emphasizes what Russ White has said, specifically that (this) policy is > local to each AS and is _not_ 'shared' with any other ASN.
understood, don't disagree... and yes, Russ's point about the local policy not being exposed publicly means ... we can't today figure this out easily. -chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
