On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Danny McPherson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > There's actually some research on this, I recall the number 'globally' > as 1.2 avg packing... but internally, that may be different, of > course. > > I'd be interested in a pointer to that Chris, if you could pass it along.
I had thought randy referenced the thing I am remembering, I'll ask once I get to the meeting venue. I think he's also pointed to some study work on the effect of ingesting 1x prefix vs packed prefixes... > The only quantitative analysis I've seen of this is here: > <http://www.tcb.net/stuff/danny-ucla-pack.pdf> > It's 3 months of data from 6 monitors. The basic observation is that > around 30% to 40% updates are packed, and these packed updates > carry up to 80% of prefixes -- a density that seems to be fairly consistent > across both iBGP and eBGP monitors. neat. > -danny _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
