On Nov 13, 2011, at 3:17 AM, John Scudder wrote: > IMO the way to handle this is observe that all routes have a validity state > attribute and that it needs to be settable in policy. I believe the draft > already says this (I will check though) and so it provides the necessary > minimum toolset needed to apply a given state to local routes. It might be > worth saying something about what state a route should take by default, which > I'm pretty sure we don't do now. (If done this might need to be broken down > into several cases, e.g. EBGP vs. IBGP vs. locally originated.)
Agreed, thanks John, -danny _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
