>> I need some way to convey in iBGP it's preference relative to other >> BGP-learned paths - how do I do that today under this architecture, >> where if it were considered under the current algorithm it may well >> be labeled "Invalid", even if a mapping exists for the local AS and >> prefix in question? > > Implementations mark it as valid today (unless the validation state > extcomm says otherwise). Re. John's reply, it probably makes sense to > clarify in the doc. Thanks for the comment.
workshop folk have asked to have intra-as generated routes marked. it is not clear to me that this would be bad. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
