On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Brian Dickson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Christopher Morrow > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> you may be willing to do same, you may also be willing to do this in >> the case of internal services routes that you don't actually want >> externally visible. > > Sure - and locally significant signatures/trust-anchors are very > important for just such an occasion. > (For any convenient value of "local", it should be noted. City, zip > code, province, continent, building, whatever.) yup, agreed. >> >> re-announcement is 'harder' since it's not clear if NTT is supposed to >> be passing cogent aol's routes or not, is it? > > Agreed - I can't be specific on exactly when, but expect me to present > something > "real soon now" on a nuts-and-bolts level of how to do this. Maybe a > month, maybe two. look forward to it! I wonder actually if some on-going survey of routing data could help to inform when a 'leak' happens... I suspect this is what cyclops/etc are doing (identifying normal 'status' of routes between networks), I'm not clear on how useful this would be in the end though, my experience with cyclops/etc haven't been useful so far :( -chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
