Oh, an "obvious legal" rumor? I'm too busy doing work to follow all those. Has there been any follow up? Please copy all that nonsense here also so everyone can be involved in rumor-mongering.
Or else, please don't. Tony On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tony, > > > I'm not sure what "legal" thing you refer to. >> > > Oh apologies .. I was under impression that we all following IETF alias as > well as participate in global NOG/RIPE events. > > As far as ietf alias see below: > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Lawsuit against IETF/SIDR/RPKI? (fwd) > Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:06:48 -0500 (EST) > From: Paul Wouters <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > > Anyone have more info on this? > > Paul > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:34:54 > From: Vesna Manojlovic <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Lawsuit against IETF/SIDR/RPKI? > X-Spam-Flag: NO > > You've heard it here first ;-) > > But it's still only a rumor... > > (does any of you have more news about it?) > > Aparently, few big carriers in the States are preparing a lawasuit against > RPKI creators, since they are funded by US government, _and_ are mandating > the system that the ISPs will need to implement... so - anti-trust suit? > > Conflict of interests? etc... > > I could only find some "old news" about this: > http://www.networkworld.com/**news/2010/121510-feds-** > internet-routing-security.html<http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/121510-feds-internet-routing-security.html> > > That's why it is very important to continue with the development of the > alternatives to the routing security... > > BTW, I got a ticket for 28c3, so -- see you there! > > Ciao, > Vesna > >
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
