On 20/03/2012 16:24, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 3/20/12 8:07 AM, David Harrington wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> FYI. The IESG decided the SIDR Interim should be cancelled because
>> it didn't meet the deadlines.
>
>> The rules about Interim meetings exist to ensure an open and fair
>> process. Other Wgs who planned an interim but didn't meet the
>> deadlines have also been forced to cancel. BEHAVE WG is one example
>> I am familiar with that had to cancel in the near past.
>
> Yes, this annoying. But realize that you're not the only ones to have
> experienced this annoyance. David mentioned BEHAVE WG. I had the same
> thing happen with the IRI WG last year. The lesson I learned is that I
> need to plan ahead farther.
I don't have a particular opinion if the meeting should be cancelled. However,
I noticed that on Friday, the responsible AD said that it was OK to have the
meeting despite the small procedural error in organizing it: the meeting
was announced on the WG list, but not on the iesg-list. On Monday, the
meeting is cancelled. That doesn't look very nice. In the future, I
suggest that the IESG makes a decision, then sticks to it, even if an
individual AD has approved something he really shouldn't.
Henk
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
http://www.uijterwaal.nl
Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
(John Glanfield, on an engineering project)
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
