On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, David Harrington wrote:
FYI. The IESG decided the SIDR Interim should be cancelled because it didn't meet the deadlines.
Thank you for the clarification that this was an IESG decision, not just Stewart's.
I still find the explanation wanting and would like to see a clarification. As I pointed out earlier, the "missed" agenda deadline is so arguable as to be laughable -- indeed, the SIDR list archive shows the agenda as a Saturday, 17 March message but with a time stamp in the wee hours of Sunday morning UTC. From that, I guess that it was still Saturday in her local timezone when the chair sent the agenda. And the other point cited, being the missend of the original announcement, was quite reasonably explained by Stewart on Friday.
Are there perhaps other reasons for your decision that haven't been stated?
To be clear: I'm not disagreeing with the final decision. Indeed, there may well be good reasons to cancel this interim meeting. But the explanations offered to date don't hold water.
-- Sam _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
