No worries.

        
Thanks,
.as

On 26 Mar 2012, at 18:13, Christopher Morrow wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Arturo Servin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I think that you silently discarded my email:
> 
> I didn't, I may not have read it ;(
> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04215.html
>> 
>> Anyhow I wasn't expecting too much, but I least I tried.
> 
> The October date may work out... would be good to discuss that though
> after this set is settled/scheduled.
> 
> -chris
> 
>> Regards,
>> .as
>> 
>> On 26 Mar 2012, at 16:43, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> 
>> So, as stated in the meeting today, and in these slides:
>>  <http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-sidr-8.pdf>
>> 
>> There is a proposal to schedule 5 future Interim Face to Face
>> (+virtual) meetings. The dates/locations are:
>> 
>> Mon Apr 30 - after ARIN (IAD)
>> Wed Jun 6 - NANOG (YVR)
>> Fri Jun 29 - (BWI/IAD)
>> Fri Jul 27 - prior to IETF84 (YVR)
>> Sun Sep 23 - prior to RIPE (AMS)
>> 
>> The hope is that:
>>  1) WG folks interested in the forward progress of the WG work can
>> attend (either physically or virtually)
>>  2) WG folk interested see this number of meetings (about 1/month for
>> the next 6 months) as appropriate
>>  3) the overlap/adjacency with existing operations meetings will help
>> travel problems AND bring in some ops focus/requirements as well to
>> the work.
>> 
>> Please have a discussion on the applicability of the meetings (number
>> and attendance capabilities) and let's close that discussion out ~Mar
>> 29, 2012 23:59 Paris Local Time (CEST?).
>> 
>> -Chris
>> <co-chair>
>> (Note: the deadline is to avoid scheduling/process deadlines in
>> getting the first meeting note out via IETF/IESG-secretary)
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>> 
>> 

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to