On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Matt Lepinski <[email protected]> wrote: > Terry, > > > On 3/27/2012 4:22 PM, Terry Manderson wrote: >> >> I feel like the Monday meeting was a bit of a lost opportunity. I >> appreciate
see previous gzip compression message :( I think we tried to stuff 8hrs of content into ~2hrs. I think we ought to revisit the content at the next opportunity, which is probably ~4/30/2012-ish. >> that the presenters made effort in presenting, and making slides and >> presenting ideas. However I feel like the "RPKI over Bittorrent" really >> needed focused discussion on what the problem is, and a resulting >> definition >> of what RPKI needs in a requirements spec to address the problems that >> were >> alluded (and BTW I am more than happy to help form that set of >> requirements). >> > > I see your point here. However, I am personally very grateful to Rob for his > BitTorrent experiment. I believe that the choke point of the global RIR i'd like to see a conversation about how this method worked/s and what impacts other transport mechanisms may have on the distribution of the data we care about. I think there's room for alternates, the bittorrent experiment seems to show that... so do comments at the mic by martin levy and others. > repositories is a vital challenge in RPKI deployment. I think the working > group would benefit from spending significant bandwidth thinking about this > challenge and I see Rob's presentation as a very reasonable way to get the > ball rolling. sure. probably also writing down the 'what are we trying to solve' with this distribution system would be good to document (terry's call for requirements). -chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
