All BGP monitoring tools need to be upgraded to now understand BGPSEC
attribute too. And surprise .. here BMP will not convert it like it will to
"legacy" speakers.
sure, they'd have to do that anyway, or they just are
'non-bgpsec-speakers' (an e|ibgp neighbour without security foo). In
other words, tomorrow for them is the same as today, the world keeps
on going round.
No. You are breaking things. BMP is not ibgp nor it is ebgp ! The
station which works today and get's BGP sessions over BMP will now be
useless as AS_PATH will not be there.
I assumed you know, but BMP idea is to replay what you are receiving (as
verbatim as implementation allows).
maybe? so far you've not convinced me... you can feel free to keep
trying though? email is cheap.
I am not sure there is point in "convincing". Removing mandatory path
attribute from BGP would be something IDR WG has to formally approve.
And it will be an interesting precedence in any case ;)
Cheers,
R.
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
