On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jakob Heitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Confeds are out of scope.
how are confeds out of scope? if you want path validation for ibgp/originated-by-you routes and the originating router is in one of the confed sub-ases you have that router sign with the confed-external/public asn, no? I'm fairly certain we planned to support this sort of activity... though I could be missing the part which is out-of-scope? > IOW, the BGPSEC validity of an update does not necessarily > prevent you from using the update if you have inside knowledge > about AS path mucking. How you use the BGPSEC validity in > your route selection is a private matter. yes, which is, I think, nice. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
