Hi, On 22 May 2012, at 08:21, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On May 22, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > >> Hi WG, >> >> On 22 May 2012, at 07:08, "Murphy, Sandra" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> An eagle eye reader points out that the agenda deadline before the June >>> meeting is in May, not June, and the day after tomorrow is still May, not >>> June. >>> >>> Still. Get any requests for topics in asap. Agenda deadline is Wed 23 May >>> (tomorrow). >> >> I would like to add to this: if there are no topics to discuss, chairs >> reserve the right to cancel the interim. So in absence of new topics, some >> confirmation that what Sandy suggested as the agenda earlier would be good. > > > Well, color me stoopid -- I have not been able to find "what Sandy suggested > as the agenda earlier". Below (quoted text) :-) > > 'tis not (AFAICS) on the wiki, the Interim Announcement doesn't have nothing > agenda like, the list doesn't seem to have anything, etc. > > W > > >>> >>> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Murphy, >>> Sandra [[email protected]] >>> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 6:27 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun >>> >>> Agenda deadline is Wed 23 Jun (day after tomorrow). >>> >>> Please send suggestions to the list. >>> >>> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Murphy, >>> Sandra [[email protected]] >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 6:05 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun >>> >>> Potential agenda items for the 6 Jun interim meeting. >>> >>> The agenda needs to be announced two weeks ahead of time, which is next >>> Wednesday. >>> >>> Please send suggested topics to the list. Below are two suggestions to >>> spark the discussion. >>> >>> (1) AS_PATH >>> >>> There was one agenda topic that we never directly addressed at the 30 Apr >>> meeting. That topic was the absence of the AS_PATH attribute from the >>> bgpsec protocol. (The info normally contained in the AS_PATH is contained >>> in the bgpsec attributes.) >>> >>> The absence of the AS_PATH did come up in discussing other topics (see the >>> minutes), but we did not discuss it directly. >>> >>> (2) router private key provisioning. >>> >>> In the interim in San Diego, there were requests (from operators) that >>> guidance to operators of how to provision a router with the needed keys >>> would be a good idea. We had some discussion in the Paris meeting of two >>> drafts discussing provisioning the routers with their needed private keys. >>> There's also been a recent flurry of discussion on the list. >>> >>> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sidr mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sidr mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sidr mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >> > > -- > With Feudalism, it's your Count that votes. > > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
