> In my opinion the biggest open issue in the bgpsec protocol draft is the > confederation issue that we discussed at the previous interim. (That is, > if we don't include AS4_Path or AS_Path in a bgpsec signed update, then > we need to somehow encode the information that would be in the > AS_confed_sequence segments of the AS_Path.)
i thought we were cheerily dumping as_confed_seq and thereby getting rid of the last sequence. essentially o you are at the border about to send to an external peer o stepping back down the sigs, possibly zero times o there will be a sig from an external peer to the confed as o strip off all sigs subsequent to that one, if any o sign from the confed as to the external peer randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
