Brian Dickson <[email protected]> wrote: >... Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:42:15 -0500 > > If a draft is accepted in its current state, then any promises by the > authors to make changes are much like promises by politicians during > election campaigns - not worth the paper they are written on.
While technically true: 1) if the WGCs let this happen, it's an abuse of power. At adoption as a WG draft, authors "relinquish change control" and different persons must be appointed document editors if authors aren't OK with that. 2) nothing goes to IESG without consensus at WG LastCall. -- John Leslie <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
