On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Byron Ellacott <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > When did the WG reach consensus on adopting this draft?
when it spent ~50 mesasages discussing it? it seems that, even if we abandon it in the end, discussing this over a draft is a good thing to do. > Thanks, > Byron > > On 13/10/2012, at 12:53 AM, Christopher Morrow <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Helo, >> Since we've been through this for a while (originally) and this has >> been quiet for ~1 month... let's call this done and move to the next >> step. >> >> 1) there was lots of discussion on the topic at hand >> 2) lots of that discussion was not about acceptance/rejection of the >> idea into the WG >> 3) lots of people contributed >> >> I do think we should continue to have this discussion more officially >> around a draft, the wg discussion leads me to believe this is the >> right course... can the authors spin a newly named version and we can >> start discussing the topic / changes? >> >> I think if, in the end, the wg decides to abandon the work that's also >> fine, but we should have a more structured chat about the topic, that >> happens around a draft. >> >> -chris >> co-chair >> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Murphy, Sandra >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Speaking as wg co-chair >>> >>> Of course revision and new request for acceptance is possible. >>> >>> Even arguing some more leading to acceptance of draft as is is a >>> possibility. >>> >>> Some commentors specifically requested that the discussion be added to some >>> existing draft. >>> >>> Trying to judge wg desire of a way to proceed. >>> >>> >>> --Sandy >>> >>> >>> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Andy >>> Newton [[email protected]] >>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:56 PM >>> >>> To: Murphy, Sandra; Alexey Melnikov; [email protected] >>> >>> Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Are the chairs not allowing the draft authors to address the issues and try >>> again? >>> >>> >>> >>> -andy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: <Murphy>, Sandra <[email protected]> >>> >>> Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:10 PM >>> >>> To: Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >>> <[email protected]> >>> >>> Subject: Re: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> <!-- >>> p >>> {margin-top:0; >>> margin-bottom:0} >>> --> >>> BODY {direction: ltr;font-family: Arial;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;}P >>> {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} >>> >>> Speaking as wg co-chair: >>> >>> >>> >>> Certainly a very lively acceptance call! >>> >>> >>> >>> The chairs do not see that there was consensus that the wg should adopt >>> this draft. >>> >>> >>> >>> But there was ample evidence that the wg was interested in the issue - by >>> the wg spending lots of time discussing the issue. >>> >>> >>> >>> So that leaves the chairs with an ambivalent message. The wg is very >>> interested in the topic but not in adopting a draft that would record any >>> decisions about the topic. >>> >>> >>> >>> What would the wg like to do now? Particularly those who disagreed with >>> the content of the draft - if you would dislike the recommendations, are >>> you OK with no recommendations instead? >>> >>> >>> >>> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: >>> >>> [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Alexey Melnikov >>> [[email protected]] >>> >>> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:12 PM >>> >>> To: >>> [email protected] >>> >>> Subject: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On behalf of SIDR WG chairs I would like to initiate 2 weeks acceptance >>> call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting starting from today, August 4th. >>> Please >>> send your positive or negative feedback to the mailing list or directly to >>> chairs. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Alexey >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sidr mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
