>> let's be honest here. the threat model was done in the late '80s. the >> base of the design in the early '90s. we're just slogging through the >> saussage machine.
"The debate is over?" There was a debate? I seem to have missed it. Were there competing requirements documents? Who authored them? Who was polled to find real world requirements? How were the final requirements determined? We're now slogging through sausage, but it's sausage we could have done without had we started from the proper end of the problem and actually built requirements first. > Um... Kind of a lot has changed since then, and I _believe_ the design was > rejected back then too... I think it might be less professionally > embarrassing to ask, what needs to change to make this viable? ;) Now, now --let's not interfere with the sausage making process by any means. That might be embarrassing to the folks who chose the required sausage. Russ -- <>< [email protected] [email protected] _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
