On Dec 7, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Montgomery, Douglas wrote: > I just want to point out that I was on a different train. Discussing the > supposition that query&cahce arch's behave differently that batch pull > archs in either startup or steady state performance. I was not commenting > on the whole trust/business model discussion. > > > I was replying to Eric's suggestion that DNS-like systems are an example > of the on-demand architectural choice.
Doug, this is getting silly. If you have a system that _requires_ full state of all data producers in the entire world before it can begin, then you are talking about a _much_ different architecture than one that only queries for _relevant_ information when it becomes relevant. If you use the latter for the former's goals, or the former for the latter's goals then so be it, but they are designed with different precepts. Eric _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
