Hello, Joe Operator here.
I don't want to interrupt the tiresome food-fight, but would like to more clearly understand how this alternative system would work. I may have lost the thread in the roiling sea of presumptions that's got this discussion bouncing hither, yon, and back again. I didn't change the subject line, but feel free to do so if needed. Tony > > Won't a demand driven system will experience something very similar when > > first fired up and and a full table dump comes across the wire in BGP? > > Ask any of the operators on this list how they feel about full table dumps > and routers refreshing table state, configs, etc when coming online. If > you're saying that RPKI is just like that, I think you just sank your > position. > > > If a demand driven system wasn't smart enough to use a hot standby with > > significant cached state, it too will suffer the latency of pulling a > > significant portion of the data it needs instantly. > > Again, we were discussing the architectural difference, not polishing the > chrome on the titanic. :) > > > While I see the architectural differences in those two, it is not clear > to > > me that the end result to a running BGP system that uses them is all that > > different. > > Hmm.. Well, re: my comment above, we have very different opinions. I > (literally) defer to operators to answer my above question, and if I'm > rebuffed on that, then so be it. >
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
