I have now read this document. [Also, thanks to the document authors,
the -01 version is a significant improvement over the -00 version]

At the meeting, both APNIC and ARIN said they would like to put these
URIs into certificates they issue.

This appears to place no burden whatsoever on the relying party. (And
some relying parties might actually find these URIs useful for finding
applicable CPS documents.)

This seems like quite a reasonable document, and I do not anticipate
that it would take a lot of working group cycles to process this
document. I would, therefore, support adoption of this document by the
working group.

- Matt Lepinski
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to