I support this document and I volunteer review.
I suffered this problem in a previous job.
Also CPS URIs in certificates are common practice. See the "Certificate
Policies" extension from my personal certificate issued by Verisign where a CPS
pointer qualifier (id-qt-cps) is present:
X509v3 extensions:
X509v3 Basic Constraints:
CA:FALSE
X509v3 Certificate Policies:
Policy: 2.16.840.1.113733.1.7.23.1
CPS: https://www.verisign.com/rpa
Obs: CPS OID = 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.2.1 (id-qt-cps)
Roque
On Mar 11, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Andy Newton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3/11/13 9:48 AM, "Matthew Lepinski" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This seems like quite a reasonable document, and I do not anticipate
>> that it would take a lot of working group cycles to process this
>> document. I would, therefore, support adoption of this document by the
>> working group.
>
> Thank you Matt. And since you beat me to getting a message to the list
> regarding the adoption of this draft, I would like to ask the working
> group to adopt this draft as a work item.
>
> -andy
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
