From: Roque Gagliano (rogaglia) [mailto:[email protected]]


The document is intended as "Informational" but do have requirement language. 
Is this what you intended?
[WEG] originally, it was just covering the problem statement. This last 
revision added the solution, and thus required some normative language to guide 
the implementation. That probably means the doc type needs to change, but I was 
looking to the WG for feedback on how to proceed (whether this should remain a 
standalone document as companion to the BGPSec protocol draft, or be integrated 
into it, or what). Last meeting, it sounded like the preference was to have 
this remain a standalone document, but I didn't hear any real guidance on 
whether it should formally update the BGPSec document or not.

Personally, I would rather all requirements to be moved to the requirements 
document so we have one unique point to read. We could publish then this 
document even as a "BCP" on a specific practice. Does point 3.15 of the BGPSEC 
requirements document seams not to cover your own requirements in Section 4. Do 
you think we can move the BGPSEC specific requirements to the other document?
[WEG] I have no objection to moving section 4 to sidr-bgpsec-reqs to add to 
3.15. I documented them here because as noted above, originally this was a 
problem statement, and so it seemed important to ensure that any solutions 
could be evaluated against their success in meeting these requirements that are 
specific to AS-migration and aliasing.

Wes

On May 29, 2013, at 3:59 PM, "George, Wes" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


All - I have not received any feedback regarding this draft since I posted the 
revision incorporating the solution into it in February. Perhaps it's time to 
call WG adoption so that it can move forward?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-george-sidr-as-migration-01

Thanks,

Wes George

________________________________
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable 
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to 
copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the 
contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and 
any printout.
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

* Persona Not Validated - 1368524010073 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
* Issuer: Symantec Corporation - Unverified

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to