Randy, On May 30, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The document is intended as "Informational" but do have requirement >> language. > > normative language in an info doc is perfectly normal and acceptable. > > this doc does not create protcol, protocol data elements, ... it says > HOW to do some tricks with already defined protocol and pdus. so info > seems not unreasonable to me. That is why I was proposing moving it to BCP. > > btw, this is a *really* cute bit of work. +1 Roque > randy
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
