I support this draft being sent to WGLC. I have read the draft. PKI imposes operational outcomes which relate to legalisms. conditions of use, conditions of operation of service, dimensions which lie outside the routing plane, and barely come into play for most of the time, but when you *want to know* about things, its useful to have a pointer in the signed material. What we think about these legalisms is not the point: its the ability to reference them which is under discussion here. There is no current mechanism to do that. This draft proposes a mechanism.
I think it does no harm, and I think it will do some good. I certainly have text which has been given to me by lawyers which I regard as highly suitable to be pointed to, by this kind of thing, and I expect other operators of (r)PKI would expect to be able to do the same. A small amount of work is required by validators of RPKI certificates to understand a new optional element can exist and not reject certificates for having the OID in the ASN.1. I can't think of anything in the draft which requires an 01, and if minor nits came up I believe they could be fixed in IESG/AUTHOR48 timeframes. -George On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Murphy, Sandra <[email protected]>wrote: > The chairs have queried the authors of > draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-00, Policy Qualifiers in RPKI > Certificates. The response was that the draft is ready for wglc. > > There was general agreement on this draft during the adoption call, with > one request for additional security considerations being addressed in the > new version. The draft is short and straightforward and the wg has not > seen fit to comment further. > > Even so, it is unusual to publish a draft with so little comment during > the time it has been a wg draft. The chairs will be looking for a stronger > than usual response. Can't publish without reviews! > > This starts a 3 week wglc on draft draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-00, > Policy Qualifiers in RPKI Certificates. Please do send comments to the > list, indicating that you do or do not believe that the draft is ready for > publication. > > The draft is available at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-00. > > --Sandy, speaking for the co-chairs > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
