Implementers do not do anything with a CPS pointer in a policy qualifier. So, this addition will not impact interoperability. That said, I understand that some people want this notice in the certificate, and I see no reason to prevent this document form moving forward.
Russ On Feb 11, 2014, at 8:16 AM, The IESG wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from the Secure Inter-Domain Routing WG > (sidr) to consider the following document: > - 'Policy Qualifiers in RPKI Certificates' > <draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-01.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > [email protected] mailing lists by 2014-02-25. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > This document updates RFC 6487 by clarifying the inclusion of policy > qualifiers in the certificate policies extension of RPKI resource > certificates. > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers/ballot/ > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
