> Implementers do not do anything with a CPS pointer in a policy > qualifier. So, this addition will not impact interoperability.
in other words it has no operational use > That said, I understand that some people want this notice in the > certificate, and I see no reason to prevent this document form moving > forward. wow, that encourages healthy discussion randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
