> Steve, > It’s more explicit and better to understand. > > But I suggest eliminating the expression concerning NIR that is “Case > 1 also encompasses a larger case, e.g., when all of the ISPs with a country > require protection for an RIR action of this sort, coordinated at a national > level. We cannot assume that the country operates an NIR." > > INR management in a country with NIR could be very complicated, with > different operation models. If necessay , a separate operation doc might be > presented, getting NIR stuff involved. > > > Di Ma > Internet Domain Name System Beijing Engineering Research Centre (ZDNS) > KNET Technologies
Thanks for the feedback. My point, in case 1, is that we cannot assume that a solution to this use case can rely on the existence of an NIR. That is compatible with your observation that an NIR might need to develop its own operations document. Steve _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
