I read the -02 version (haven't gotten around yet to looking at the changes made in the -03 version). However, this is good work and an alternate delivery mechanism for RPKI data is a very reasonable mechanism for SIDR to work on. I believe that RSYNC will work fine for quite a while. However, at some point it will be desire-able to transition to an alternative delivery mechanism and the technical direction the the authors of draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-delta-protocol appears to be a good one.
If the working group adopts this document, I would be willing to review future versions. - Matt Lepinski On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > The authors of draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-delta-protocol-03 have requested > working group adoption. > > A working group adoption call starts now and will end 14 days from now on > 28 January. > > Please respond to say whether you support adoption of this work as a > working group work item AND whether you will participate in the discussion. > > Remember that working group consensus to adopt the work needs responses, > not just absence of objection, so speak up. > > --Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > >
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
