I'm in favour of this work getting adoption and discussion. I've followed
the drafts.

I think my skepticisms around repository consistency and sync in general
aren't reasons not to have this work in the WG, and the questions I have in
my mind about atomicity, update and how the serial/difference mechanism
copes with large flat spaces being changed will get covered off in WG
discussion.

-George

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:

> The authors of draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-delta-protocol-03 have requested
> working group adoption.
>
> A working group adoption call starts now and will end 14 days from now on
> 28 January.
>
> Please respond to say whether you support adoption of this work as a
> working group work item AND whether you will participate in the discussion.
>
> Remember that working group consensus to adopt the work needs responses,
> not just absence of objection, so speak up.
>
> --Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>
>
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to