hurray! ambiguity in questions was raised by an interested party... I'd rather do this Friday at the end of the meeting with a short presentation/conversation.
-chris On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Christopher Morrow <[email protected]> wrote: > During the meeting today (tues 11/3/2015) one of the authors of: > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered > > noted that after the last set of updates and over the history of the > document (2+yrs) there's been no real support nor direction from the > working-group. Additionally, all co-authors noted that the lack of > support and direction meant that abandoning the draft seemed like the > best current direction. > > The primary author: Geoff Huston ([email protected]) is willing to toss > the XML over the fence to another author/editor if there is interest, > or to let the draft expire/die if no one is willing to take up the > pencil. > > Over the next three weeks let's discuss the direction/end-goal and > determine if 'abandon' or 'new author' is the best course of action > here. > > -chris > sidr-co-chair _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
