I think the discussion on the work should continue. New questions are being raised and the authors should address them in a revised draft going forward.
I also had a couple of new questions/suggestions (hopefully new!) about the method. I have mentioned them in my other post replying to Tim's post. Sriram ________________________________________ From: sidr <[email protected]> on behalf of Christopher Morrow <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2015 8:52 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [sidr] Validation Reconsidered (again/again) question Please take 2 weeks time to consider: "This document was adopted as a WG work item, should we accept this change and complete the work or not?" where: 'this document' is: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered> I'll close the mic line on: 11/20/2015 Nov 20, 2015 -Chris sidr-co-chair _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
