Hi! On 5/5/16 6:51 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> mostly because I don't see a clear method to ensure that 'third party' has: >>> 1) up-to-date information >> Same with RTR cache server. > > i would not load routers from rpki caches i do not own and control
Me neither. Yet people do it. Whether they are going to be majority or not, time will tell. > >>> 2) my best interest at heart >> If you peer with a route server, you should establish a trust relation >> anyway. > > in my heart i agree with chris, a prudent operator does not outsource > security. > > otoh, i also do not think a prudent operator outsources bgp, i.e. uses a > route server. > > putting the two together, if you are willing to outsource bgp to a route > server, then outsourcing bgp security to the route server is not much of > a leap. Agree 100%. > > chris, think of it as shooting yourself in the foot with a two-barrelled > gun instead of one with one barrel. :) :-) -C. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
