>> mostly because I don't see a clear method to ensure that 'third party' has: >> 1) up-to-date information > Same with RTR cache server.
i would not load routers from rpki caches i do not own and control >> 2) my best interest at heart > If you peer with a route server, you should establish a trust relation > anyway. in my heart i agree with chris, a prudent operator does not outsource security. otoh, i also do not think a prudent operator outsources bgp, i.e. uses a route server. putting the two together, if you are willing to outsource bgp to a route server, then outsourcing bgp security to the route server is not much of a leap. chris, think of it as shooting yourself in the foot with a two-barrelled gun instead of one with one barrel. :) randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
