Hi, So, to be clear I think this is the related text in section 9 of RFC 6487:
A new document will be issued as an update to this RFC. The CP for the RPKI [RFC6484] will be updated to reference the new certificate profile. The new CP will define a new policy OID for certificates issued under the new certificate profile. And references in 6484 (CP) to 6487 should be reviewed and reference the validation-reconsidered instead (since it updates the profile), and we should have another OID instead of the one section 1.2. But there is no need to use a different OID for the RFC3779 extensions used. Right? ..just trying to make sure I am looking at the right things here, please correct me if the above is wrong. Thanks Tim > On 20 Jul 2016, at 16:22, Stephen Kent <[email protected]> wrote: > > Rob, > > I agree with your suggestion to create a new OID for this purpose. This can > be noted in the document under discussion. > > I also agree with Russ's comment that the cert policy needs to be updated to > reflect the fact that use either OID is OK (if we stick with one policy OID). > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
