Hi all, I believe SLURM is useful work.
I know that RPSTIR has an implementation, but the RIPE NCC RPKI Validator (yes, we need a cool name..) has been implementing the same semantics for a long time (years) - using a different format. I do not know whether rcynic has implemented similar. Rob? Two implementation have implemented similar behaviour independently. In any case I think there is benefit in having a common format and semantics defined, and I supported adoption. But.. I do have concerns and questions about the *current* format defined in the document. It represents the RPSTIR implementation. I have been meaning to discuss and comment as an RP implementor but unfortunately have not been able to do so, due to other priorities. Going forward I appreciate that Declan Ma volunteers to take on the work as author, but I think it would be best to have author representatives of each of the three RPs to ensure that the resulting configuration file and semantics are understood by all and feasible to implement by all. In short I would like to volunteer to co-author and would kindly ask Rob if he would be willing. I have no problems with moving this to sidr-ops and having the discussion on content then and there. Tim > On 24 Jul 2016, at 01:58, David Mandelberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Di, enjoy. You have my permission to take over SLURM. Let me know if > there's anything I can do to help. > > On 07/22/2016 05:48 AM, Declan Ma wrote: >> Sandy & Chris, >> >> Thank Steve for recommending me to take over SLURM. >> >> With David’s permission, I would be happy to assume responsibility for SLURM. >> >> I think SLURM is quite important to RPKI operation in term of local network. >> >> SLURM provides a simple way to enable INR holders to establish a local, >> customized view of the RPKI, by overriding RPKI repository data if needed. >> >> In particular, I was exchanging notes with David earlier on the use of >> multiple SLURM files among others, which I believe is worth more text in the >> next version of SLURM. >> >> Di >> >>> 在 2016年7月21日，19:42，Stephen Kent <[email protected]> 写道： >>> >>> Sandy & Chris, >>> >>> I believe Chris' declaration is premature. >>> >>> I anticipate that Dr. Ma may want to take over slurm, with David's >>> permission. >>> >>> With a few minor tweaks the use cases doc can be done. >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sidr mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >> > > > -- > David Eric Mandelberg / dseomn > http://david.mandelberg.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
