Here is the pointer to the document: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rir-rpki-allres-ta-app-statement-01
Apologies for my earlier laziness. On 9/5/2016 3:32 PM, Carlos M. Martinez wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I know we already discussed this over private email, but perhaps you can > comment on the list on the future of the requested WG adoption call for > the ‘all resources’ applicability statement draft. > > thanks! > > -Carlos > > On 2 Sep 2016, at 17:56, Chris Morrow wrote: > >> >> Howdy SIDR peeps, >> (+bonus ops ad) >> >> Following on the Berlin meeting we were trying to accomplish two >> things: >> >> 1) get all documents related to sidr protocols into wglc and then >> publication >> >> 2) get all documents which are more operationally focused moved >> along to an ops group (sidr-ops or something akin to that) >> >> With that in mind there are 8 documents in the publication queue: >> draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration >> draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs >> draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops >> draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview >> draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles >> draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol >> draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling >> draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis >> >> and 11 still in progress. Of the 11 left Sandy and I think they >> roughly break down like: >> >> Documents which should move to the ops group: >> draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover >> draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases >> draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light - authors notified/queried >> about this >> draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying >> >> documents which should finish out in sidr: >> draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol >> draft-ietf-sidr-publication >> draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup - pub request in flight >> draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation >> draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered >> draft-ietf-sidr-slurm - authors recently updated >> draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions - wglc imminent >> >> I think if there's no meaningful discussion on change for these >> between now and 9/16/2016 (Sept 16th) we will assume this list is >> correct. For documents in the 'move' list, if progress to publication >> happens 'good!'. For all documents in the 'stays' list: >> 1) we aim to have wglc by Seoul >> 2) publication requests started on as many as possible >> >> We plan to meet in Seoul, but not in Chicago (Mar 2017) where we >> expect the ops group to exist and meet. We can progress documents in >> SIDR after Seoul, but the WG should close out shortly after the new >> year. (or that's the goal). >> >> Thoughts? >> -chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
