At Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:06:25 -0700, joel jaeggli <joe...@bogus.com> wrote: > > [1 Re: Current document status && directionz <multipart/mixed (7bit)>] > [1.1 <text/plain; windows-1252 (quoted-printable)>] > On 9/2/16 1:56 PM, Chris Morrow wrote: > > > > Howdy SIDR peeps, > > (+bonus ops ad) > > > > Following on the Berlin meeting we were trying to accomplish two > > things: > > > > 1) get all documents related to sidr protocols into wglc and then > > publication > > > > 2) get all documents which are more operationally focused moved > > along to an ops group (sidr-ops or something akin to that) > > > > With that in mind there are 8 documents in the publication queue: > > draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration > > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs > > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops > > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview > > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles > > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol > > draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling > > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis > > > > and 11 still in progress. Of the 11 left Sandy and I think they > > roughly break down like: > > > > Documents which should move to the ops group: > > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover > > draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases > > draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light - authors notified/queried about > > this > > draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying > > I think we good good feeback on the draft of a charter, I will start > work on taking this to the IESG, but as some point soon the time will > come to ask for community review of that proposal. >
I also forgot to mention the all-res draft: draft-rir-rpki-allres-ta-app-statement is waiting for some AD comments to complete (with chairs I mean) to set location/direction. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
