On Nov 30, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:
> the point is the tcp 'stream' does not have to be hacked in any way.
> the hack is at a layer above.

I agree. I also agree with your earlier

On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:40 PM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:
> none of this is new. 

I guess I will wait for Alvaro to answer, but so far I'm not seeing the need 
for anything more than a couple lines that remind the reader of the basic 
(in)security properties of BGP, maybe an RFC 4272 reference.

--John
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to