Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Just a thought: Would it be useful to add an IESG note saying something like in the sheperd write-up: "[...] there are published references that preceded the filing of the patent, especially those mentioned in RFC6090. RFC6090 notes that its descriptions "may be useful for implementing the fundamental algorithms without using any of the specialized methods that were developed in following years."" I know we usuall don't do things like this. But I'm wondering how someone who wants to implement this should figure this out otherwise....? _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
