> Just a thought: Would it be useful to add an IESG note saying something
> like in the sheperd write-up:
> "[...] there are published references
> that preceded the filing of the patent, especially those mentioned
> in RFC6090. RFC6090 notes that its descriptions "may be useful
> for implementing the fundamental algorithms without using any of
> the specialized methods that were developed in following years.""
perhaps the simple truth would raise less objection; if it does raise
objection then i suspect something is broken.
say that there is an ipr filing on this draft and the wg considered that
and decided to go ahead anyway. also say that \cite{rfc6090} describes
relevant algorithms and has no ipr filed against it.
randy
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
