Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - I share various people's concerns about the deployability of this protocol, but I realize this is where the WG ended up after many years of work so fingers crossed, I guess. - Fig 2: Shouldn't the signatures in Sig Block 2 have different identifiers (e.g., X2, Y2) than those in Sig Block 1? - Sec 6.1: "(likely a small number of years)" -- given how hard these things are to predict, is it wise to include this text here? - I was surprised not to see an example message or two in this document. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
