Hi Alissa, Sorry for the delay in responding. Thank you for your comments. My responses inline below. I have already made the changes (as noted below) in my editor copy of the draft version-22.
>From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 11:21 AM … > - Fig 2: Shouldn't the signatures in Sig Block 2 have >different identifiers (e.g., X2, Y2) than those in Sig Block 1? Good catch. Fixed. > - Sec 6.1: "(likely a small number of years)" -- given how hard >these things are to predict, is it wise to include this text here? I have removed the phrase in the parentheses. > - I was surprised not to see an example message or two in this document. Sean is working together with Oliver and me on providing example messages in the draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs. Stephen and Sean agreed that would be a better place and it is happening: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg08288.html Regards, Sriram _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
