> - section 9: What's the background to removing the statement > that one of TCP-AO ssh etc SHOULD be used? What is the reality > of deployments here? I assume it is not TCP-AO anyway but does > TLS or SSH get used?
TCP-AO never maaterialized. off-hand, i can not think of a way to measure who is using what, but i have this horrible suspicion it's all "it's all inside our domain of control, so let's just run nekkid." > - various places: I think 6810 was correct in using "that" and > not "which" in many places. I realise that's a fairly frequent > style thing that gets toggled though, but I bet the RFC editor > sets a load of those back to "that" :-) chicago style. the rfced and we amuse ourselves over that one. which is why rfced gets the big bucks. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
